lunes, 27 de julio de 2015

Evidence base for pre-employment medical screening OMS - WHO

Joseph Pachman a

a. Centre of Continuing Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, United States of America.
Correspondence to Joseph Pachman (e-mail: jpctny@yahoo.com).
(Submitted: 03 March 2008 – Revised version received: 11 October 2008 – Accepted: 19 October 2008 – Published online: 26 May 2009.)
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87:529-534. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.052605

Introduction

Ideally, the pre-employment medical examination (also referred to as a pre-placement examination) strives to place and maintain employees in an occupational environment adapted to their physiological and psychological capacities. The goal of the pre-employment examination is to determine whether an individual is fit to perform his or her job without risk to himself or others.1 This is also conceptualized within the practice of occupational medicine – it is assumed that the examiner is required to have detailed knowledge of both working and health conditions.2
Over the past 20 years, medicine has undergone a significant paradigm shift.3 Traditionally, the application of medical principles was a static process, modified on occasion by the practitioner’s experience. More recently, in part fuelled by computer-accessible databases, techniques of systematic review of data of clinical guidelines and economic analyses have become more established. For a variety of reasons, these evidence-based methods have only recently been applied to occupational health risks and interventions. As noted by Carter, the application of these methods in occupational medicine would likewise “improve the quality of prevention and would also enable practitioners to give more soundly based advice and to secure their professional positions as providers of quality assured information”.3
Evidence-based medicine promotes the appraisal and application of best practices in health care.4 There is a growing awareness that decisions in occupational health practice should be supported by evidence. However, in comparison with clinical research, occupational health research does provide some unique challenges. In addition to the general absence of randomly controlled studies, unique barriers to implementation need to be considered.4
Unfortunately, the use of pre-employment examinations can be considered to have been more cultural than data driven. In this context, it is interesting to consider how, for example, an equivalent ritual practice occurring in a less-developed country might be viewed. There is very little empirical evidence in support of pre-employment examinations, relative to either economic or health outcomes.1 As Carter has pointed out, the ritualistic use of pre-employment examinations might occur because much occupational practice is driven by a “compliance mentality”.3 Perhaps, most importantly, users of occupational health practices frequently value stability more than improvement, especially as it is generally not seen as core to the business. Occupational physicians are part of this process that values tradition more than evidence. Often, these physicians have championed current practices within the organization for a variety of reasons. They often believe that they are too busy or pragmatic to examine processes that might undermine their own job security. More often, they are simply enmeshed in a cultural tradition that also has intuitive appeal, driven by “the need to do something”.5
The objective of pre-employment examinations has traditionally been to ensure that prospective employees can perform their jobs safely without placing co-workers at risk. Despite these focused goals, pre-employment testing often exceeds this scope.6 Indiscriminate testing inevitably yields findings that are not relevant.7 The required follow-up or “clearance” for these findings can delay employment, result in the spurious rejection of a candidate, divert resources from efforts that might be beneficial to health outcomes, as well as cause unnecessary expense.7
An example of a long-established occupational health practice that has recently undergone scrutiny is the pre-employment chest X-ray. Loyhiya et al. undertook an empirical analysis of the efficacy of this practice. They concluded that the use of the chest X-ray in this setting was contrary to established practice guidelines, unnecessary and wasteful.8
Hessel & Zeiss examined the value of the medical assessment examination that was used for both pre-employment and periodically during employment.9 They found that as a screening examination, very little benefit was realized. Only 1.7% of examinations resulted in diagnoses considered to be significant according to defined criteria.
The most detailed assessment of the criteria and methods used in the pre-employment examination as an assessment of fitness for work was performed by Serra et al. in 2006.2 The authors analysed all published research regarding fitness-for-work examinations from 1966–2005. They hypothesized that, despite the acceptance of this process, there were few to no validated criteria or research that would support their efficacy.
The consensus was that fitness for work is mainly determined by physical demands and not by medical conditions (with psychiatric conditions a possible exception).10 In addition, the assessment of fitness for work is a better predictor of future health outcomes and costs than medical diagnoses.11 Most importantly, despite being common practice in occupational medicine, the validity and effectiveness of judgements on unfitness for work are not based on evidence and are likely “doubtful”.12 Shepherd concluded that there is scant evidence on the effectiveness of pre-employment examinations to prevent future health-related occupational risks.13

Screening for hypertension

Even for common medical conditions such as hypertension, no standardized criteria are used to determine fitness for work.14 For example, in the United States of America (USA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement for fitness for flying is 155 mmHg (20.6 kPa) while the Department of Transportation requirement for operating a commercial motor vehicle is 140 mmHg (18.6 kPa). Are we to assume that there is a higher medical threshold for operating a motor vehicle than for flying an aeroplane? It is likely that the political context needs to be considered. The airline union lobbied against excluding pilots on the basis of age. As hypertension is correlated with age, was a political decision presented as “medical” criteria?
Cut-off values of blood pressure in the pre-employment examination have been found to be arbitrary, variable and unrelated to the type of work tasks.14 There is concern regarding inappropriate job exclusion on this basis.2 In addition, there is no consensus in the literature as to whether hypertensive complications are occupation dependent. For example, a large prospective study of 270 000 employees of Bell, an American telecommunications company, revealed no excess in coronary heart disease in workers in higher management, those with the greatest responsibilities or those experiencing the most frequent job changes.15

Potential racial bias

Continuing with the example of blood pressure, it has been established that African Americans are at a higher risk for higher blood pressure and hypertension. Is it implicitly, if not explicitly, discriminatory to use this (arbitrary) criteria as a basis for job exclusion? Murphy conducted a survey to determine whether occupational physicians exclude job applicants by applying blood pressure criteria.14 Sixty eight percent of the physicians reported excluding job applicants with hypertension permanently, on their own initiative. The author also noted that “the high prevalence of hypertension in the adult population ensures that its widespread use as a criterion for employment would have significant social implications”.
Another example of potential racial bias can be seen in the use of pre-employment screening for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) in the chemical industry. Theoretically, the absence of this enzyme could place an individual at an increased risk for haemolysis if exposed to certain oxidizing chemicals. In reality, there is no increased risk in the workplace.16 However, the chemical industry continues to commonly use this component of the pre-employment examination and to exclude candidates on this basis. The incidence of G6PD deficiency is higher among dark-skinned individuals by a significantly higher margin (i.e. 10% of a dark-skinned population versus < 1% of a fair-skinned population). Certainly, a G6PD deficiency does not meet the threshold of a direct threat, as interpreted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (i.e. a risk that is significant, key, imminent and severe; supported by scientific evidence, not prejudice or supposition; and based on an individual assessment, not generalizations about a group of persons). In the South African mining industry, dark-skinned miners are screened more frequently than lighter-skinned workers.9 Clearly, the assessment of fitness for a job needs to be considered in the context of human rights.
Although physicians frequently are required to evaluate medical risk in the workplace, there is generally no accepted strategy or evidence-based strategy for these analyses.17 In general, there is very little data regarding the susceptibility of workers with any chronic diseases to workplace exposures and theirability to sustain employment. Workers with chronic medical conditions vary in their probability of becoming ill depending on their underlying health, their ability to adhere to treatment, as well as intrinsic variability.18

Economic considerations

Another concern regards the use of arbitrary medical criteria as surrogates for economic decisions. A survey in the USA found that 68% of occupational physicians reported certifying candidates with hypertension as unfit because their inclusion in the workplace would increase the company’s health insurance premium.14 Ironically, the existing research suggests that pre-employment examinations are not even cost-effective in reducing a company’s potential financial liability.13 There also appears to be no added value for the pre-employment process regarding indirect costs. Collings found no difference in future rates of absenteeism as a result of pre-employment examination findings.19 Lowenthal, using retrospective chart reviews, found no significant effect on employee longevity, workers’ compensation claims experience or utilization of health-care resources.20

Unintended negative effects

There are two different requirements for medical standards in the aviation industry. An employer invests not only in short-term safety but in the employee remaining fit throughout his or her career. On the other hand, the national authority responsible for air safety (e.g. the Civil Aviation Authority in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the FAA in the USA) is only concerned with ensuring that the licence holder will be unlikely to suffer sudden incapacitation during a short period (e.g. six months to one year) for which his or her medical certificate is valid.21 There is some international agreement on the medical standards for pilots, flight engineers and air traffic control officers.21 More recently, the Joint Aviation Authorities have produced a set of European standards. In all cases, the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations agency, issues guidance material on the interpretation of standards. Experience suggests that accident risk increases directly with the total number of medical disabilities.21 This risk also falls dramatically with increasing age, at least up until the age of 60. Unnecessary removal of middle-aged pilots on medical grounds by younger, less experienced pilots has been shown to be detrimental to air safety.21
During the FAA pre-employment medical examination, medication use requires consideration. If a prospective pilot indicates that they use prescribed medication to treat depression, they are automatically disqualified without recourse of appeal. Since women are more likely to be diagnosed and treated with antidepressant medication, consideration needs to also be given to gender bias in pre-employment examinations. As is often the case, this criterion is arbitrary and not supported by scientific evidence. The reality is that the exclusion criteria may encourage pilots to fly when they are depressed and, more alarmingly, self-medicate some of the symptoms of depression (e.g. early morning awakening) with over-the-counter medications, such as diphenhydramine. The dictum “first do no harm” appears to be ignored in what is often considered an otherwise benign, if not effective, process. Regarding the industry in general, McGregor has referenced the high degree of subjectivity regarding pre-employment exams in the entire airline industry.22
In the same context, the issues of shame and humiliation should also be considered. For example, as part of the USA’s Reserve Officer Training Corps “pre-employment” process, young men and women, typically of 17 years of age, are subjected to a physical exam that includes an anal inspection by the examiner. If the examining physician indicates that this portion of the examination was deferred, the candidates are not eligible to proceed to training. Although this might be considered an extreme example, it is likely that undue anxiety is experienced by pre-employment candidates yet this requirement is arbitrary and unsubstantiated. At the pre-employment level, regarding fitness for military duty, Popper has criticized the medical process as being mechanistic and fragmented.23

Paternalism versus risk factors

Physical capacity is essential for highly demanding occupations, especially when public safety is involved.2 However, often non-essential job elements are included. For example, it is a common practice to measure nicotine levels during pre-employment examinations for prospective firefighters. While the effects of smoking are well known, this behaviour does not represent a “direct threat” (i.e. the evolving legal standard which includes the components of imminent threat).24
Smoking has been found to be related to an increased risk of work-related injury.25 However, as pointed out by the authors, using smoking as a medical exclusion criteria would result in unemployment of an unacceptably high percentage of many populations. Furthermore, given that many risk factors (such as smoking) are associated with higher job demands as well as long latency of onset, many workers would not be able to change jobs.
The Americans for Disability Act includes the notion that overprotection or paternalism of workers is not acceptable. In the case of using nicotine levels to determine smoking behaviour, it is not clear if the objective is the latter or if it is more related to potential economic results, as discussed above. Moreover, there is no evidence of an added economic benefit to the business of pre-employment medical exams. However, the pre-employment examination could be transformed into a health promotion process that includes a discussion of risk factors. As Chau et al. have indicated, preventive measures could help make workers aware of risks and therefore improve their lifestyles.25

Psychiatric disorders and substance abuse

Mental health dysfunction is reported to be related to absenteeism, long-term sickness and early retirement.26 According to Glozier et al., mental ill health is the second largest cause of work-related problems, after musculoskeletal dysfunction.26 In the United Kingdom, mental illness accounts for one third of all work-related illness, is the second major cause of long-term occupational absence and is responsible for 20% of early retirement.27,28
Not surprisingly, surveys in both Canada and the USA have suggested that workers with alcohol and substance abuse have significantly higher rates of disability.29,30 In addition, Kessler et al. have found that combinations of mental illness, substance abuse and chronic physical illness result in greater disability than would be predicted by simply adding their component effects.29 A previous history of low back pain, particularly when associated with absence from work for more than one month or co-morbidity with depression, was associated with significantly higher absence from work.30,31 In addition, certain conditions are more critical because of their potential for serious workplace disruption. For example, it is generally accepted that workplace violence should be prevented to “the greatest degree possible, by careful evaluation of fitness for work”.32 Unfortunately, assessment of mental health and the potential for alcohol abuse, including the use of standardized screening questionnaires such as MAST (Michigan Alcohol Screening Test) or psychiatric illness history, during the pre-employment examination has not fared well.32 In contrast, work history has been found to be the most important element in assessing fitness for work.33,34 The most important variable in predicting the risk of violence in the workplace is a past history of poorly controlled aggression.32
The presence of psychiatric conditions in the workplace is a problem of ever-increasing significance.32 However, Glozier et al. concluded that screening for common mental disorders during a pre-employment process was “pointless”.26 Even in the case of depression and anxiety, there is no empirical evidence regarding variables that might predict successful employment.35 However, community surveys in both Canada and the USA have found that people with substance abuse problems do experience more disability days than the rest of the population.29,30 In a study performed for the International Labour Organization, it was noted that approximately 80% of drug testing worldwide occurred as part of a pre-employment process.36 Similarly, pre-employment drug testing was performed by 98% of companies in the USA, while only 3% of companies did this in 1986.37,38 However, 80% of the companies acknowledged that they had never performed a cost-effectiveness analysis. One such analysis concluded that it cost a company US$ 77 000 to find one substance user during the pre-employment process.38 It appears that pre-employment testing has no impact on reducing either absenteeism or productivity and so White has suggested that there is insufficient support for drug testing programmes as pre-employment tools.38
Shahandeh & Coborn pointed out the ethical issues that arose as a result of workplace drug testing in Europe.36 White has also discussed privacy and civil rights issues.38 French, Roebuck & Alexandre concluded that, “besides the legal ramifications, drug testing worksites may discourage highly productive employees”.37

Conclusion

Any health assessment should be appropriate to the requirement.39 Medical examinations are only justified when the job involves working in hazardous environments, requires high standards of fitness, is required by law or when the safety of other workers or of the public is concerned. Generally, a health assessment by questionnaire should suffice and physicians should advise against the application of physical or mental standards that are not relevant to fulfilment of the essential job functions.
Accordingly, to satisfy duty-of-care requirements without discriminating against people, it is important to undertake a case-specific assessment of risk. To accomplish this, knowledge of the relevant medical history, the proposed job and the work location is required.40 Three specific recommendations are suggested. First, to eliminate the pre-employment physical examination. It is reasonable to require an applicant to complete a medical history form. A medical examiner can then review this with the applicant, including a discussion of risk factors and strategies for health promotion. It is likely that medical examiners will need some brief training in this process. It has been argued that evidence alone is often not a sufficient guide for action in occupational health.41 According to Franco, “the occupational health physician must have skills to identify the problem in its context correctly”.41 Accordingly, it is recommended that a job-demands analysis should be available for inspection by the physician. Medical examiners should be able to request additional testing or data as is deemed necessary, especially in consideration of certain international assignments.
Second, to eliminate pre-employment drug screening. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that this process is cost-effective. This screening likely represents an expensive and redundant alternative to an examination of previous work history.
Third, to develop some consensus regarding best practice and conduct clinical trials regarding assumptions. If a set of consensus-based recommendations can be developed, assistance should be provided to medical directors and others to implement change. Appreciate that a paradigm change of any sort is difficult to occur and improvement goals should be incremental. Focus should be on the ethical and evidence-base for pre-employment practices. Ideally, these practices should not exclude impaired or at-risk workers but should strive to fit jobs to their abilities and provide counselling for risk management. ■

Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dr Allen of the University of Connecticut School of Humanitarian Administrative Studies, Dr Glen Pransky, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, and Dr Brian Davies, Medical Director of the United Nations Medical Service, for their support.
Funding: There was no funding for this paper. This work was performed on a voluntary basis at the request of the United Nations Medical Services.
Competing interests: None declared.

References

sábado, 11 de julio de 2015

Teorías psicológicas de las Religiones Primitivas

Algunos autores del siglo XVIII pensaban que la religión tenía su origen en el fetichismo. Esta tesis tuvo una gran vigencia en el tiempo. Por ejemplo, Comte decía que el fetichismo era el culto que prestaban los negros de la costa de África occidental a cosas inanimadas o a animales, evolucionaba hacia el politeísmo, y éste, hacia 

el monoteísmo.


Estas teorías y otras parecidas decían que el hombre primitivo es esencialmente racional, aunque sus
 intentos para explicar los fenómenos desconcertantes sean toscos e ilógicos.
La Escuela del mito natural, escuela alemana, daba a entender que los dioses de la antigüedad,
 y por implicación los dioses de cualquier lugar y época, no eran más que fenómenos de la naturaleza
 personificados: el sol, la luna, las estrellas, el alba, la renovación primaveral, los ríos violentos, etc.

Todo conocimiento humano, referido a estas ocasiones al hombre primitivo, llega a través de los 
sentidos. Sólo se podía pensar en el infinito una vez surgida la idea del mismo mediante metáforas y 
símbolos.


Spencer y Tylor, el último fuertemente apoyado en este punto por su discípulo Andrew Lang, fueron 
contrarios a las teorías del mito natural, y tuvieron éxito cuando propusieron otros criterios. Herbert 
Spencer(1) decía que el origen de la religión hay que buscarlo más en la creencia en los espectros en
lugar que en la creencia en las almas.


La idea de los espectros evoluciona inevitablemente hacia la de los dioses, espectros de los antepasa
dos remotos o de personas notables que se divinizan.


La teoría de Tylor sobre el animismo, procede de Comte y es parecida a la de Spencer, aunque resalta
 más la idea de alma que la de espectro. «Animismo».


La teoría consiste en dos tesis principales, de las cuales la primera da razón de su origen, y la segunda,
 de su desarrollo. Las reflexiones sobre el hombre primitivo le llevan a la conclusión de que para 
explicar todo esto es preciso postular la presencia o ausencia de cierta entidad inmaterial: el alma.


El alma, al poderse separar de aquello en que se aloja, puede considerarse independiente de su
 morada material. Con todo ello se atribuyó al hombre primitivo una sistematización lógica fabricada 
por el especialista y se puso ésta
 como explicación de las creencias de aquél.


Al tratar la magia, a la cual distingue de la religión más por convivencia expositiva que por razones de 
etiología o validez, también destaca el elemento racional de lo que llamó «...ese piélago de absurdos».


Sir James Frazer(2) escribió “The Golden Bugh” (La Rama Dorada)(3). Según él, el género humano en
 conjunto pasa, antes o después, por tres estados de desarrollo intelectual: de la magia a la religión y
 de la religión a la ciencia, esquema que puede proceder de las fases de Comte (la teológica,
 la metafísica y la positiva).


Dice Frazer que las inteligencias más agudas acabaron por descubrir, probablemente, que la magia 
no conseguía de hechos sus fines, pero, como todavía eran incapaces de salvar sus dificultades por
 medios empíricos y de enfrentarse a sus crisis mediante una filosofía refinada, caían en otra ilusión: 
la de que existían seres espirituales que podían ayudarles.


En consecuencia, mientras que los practicantes de la magia y el científico realizan sus operaciones 
con total confianza, el sacerdote las realiza con temor y temblor.


Este autor también proporcionó algunos términos clasificatorios como los de similaridad y los de 
contacto, la magia homeopática o imitativa y la magia por contagio.


Estas teorías intelectualistas no pueden refutarse y tampoco pueden defenderse, por la sencilla razón 
de que no existe testimonio alguno sobre el origen de las creencias religiosas. El gran progreso que
 conoció la etnografía en las últimas décadas del siglo XIX y a principios del XX tiene su ejemplo, entre
 otros, en Wilhelm Schmidt, que pensó que debía existir un estadio previo al animismo, un estadio de 
mana en el que la idea de suerte, de lo fasto y lo nefasto, fuera el único ingrediente de lo que él llamó 
lo supremo.


Andrew Lang señaló que el concepto de dios creador, moral, paternal, omnipotente y omnisciente se 
encuentra entre los pueblos más primitivos del globo, probablemente debido a lo que solía llamarse 
el argumento del designio, vale decir la conclusión racional, por parte del hombre primitivo, de que 
el mundo de alrededor debe ser obra de algún ser superior. Las dos corrientes del pensamiento
 religioso (animismo y monoteísmo) llegaron a unirse finalmente, una a través de las fuentes hebreas 
y otra a través de las helenísticas, en el cristianismo.


Marett expresaba que en el hombre primitivo no son las ideas las que hacen surgir la acción, sino la 
acción la que hace surgir las ideas. Los pueblos primitivos tienen la sensación de que existe un poder
 oculto en determinadas personas y cosas, y de que la presencia o ausencia de esta sensación es lo 
que separa lo sagrado de lo profano, el mundo de lo portentoso del mundo de cada día.


En su obra “Cultura primitiva” (1871) Tylor definió el animismo como la creencia general en seres
 espirituales y lo consideró “una mínima definición de religión”. Afirmaba que todas las religiones, 
desde las más simples a las más complejas, entrañan alguna forma de animismo. De acuerdo con 
Tylor, los pueblos primitivos, es decir, aquellos sin tradiciones escritas, creen que los espíritus o 
almas son la causa de la vida en los seres humanos; representan las almas como fantasmas, con 
forma de vapores o sombras, las cuales pueden trasmigrar de una persona a otra, de los muertos a 
los vivos, e incluso de las plantas, animales y objetos inanimados hacia otros individuos de su especie.
 Al formular su teoría, Tylor asumía que la filosofía animística se desarrollaba en un intento de 
explicar las causas de los sueños, los trances y la muerte, la diferencia entre un cuerpo viviente 
y uno muerto, así como la naturaleza 
de las imágenes que uno distingue en sueños y trances.


Las teorías de Tylor fueron criticadas por el antropólogo británico Robert R. Marett, quien afirmaba 
que estos pueblos primitivos no podían haber sido tan intelectuales y que la religión debía haber
 tenido un origen más emocional e intuitivo. Rechazaba la teoría de Tylor al respecto, de que todo
 objeto era considerado como ser vivo. Marett pensaba que estos grupos primitivos debían haber
 considerado algunos objetos dentro de su teoría como inertes y que probablemente consideraron 
sólo aquellos objetos que tenían cualidades inusuales o que se comportaban de forma impredecible 
o misteriosa durante su vida. Sostenía, además, que el antiguo concepto de vitalidad no estaba lo
 bastante elaborado para incluir la noción de un alma o espíritu inherente al objeto. Los pueblos 
primitivos trataban a los objetos que consideraban animados como si tuvieran vida, sentimiento y
 voluntad propia, pero no distinguían entre el cuerpo de un objeto y un alma que pudiera entrar en 
él o abandonarlo.


Marett denominó este punto de vista “animatismo” o “preanimismo”, y afirmó que el animismo 
debía surgir del animatismo, el cual podía incluso convivir junto a creencias animísticas más 
evolucionadas.


Para Marett, la magia es una actividad supletoria en aquellas situaciones en que faltan medios
 prácticos para conseguir un fin; su función es catártica o estimulante y da al hombre valor, consuelo,
 esperanza, tenacidad. Estas actividades supletorias pasan de ser sustitutivas a ser auxiliares de la
 acción empírica sin perder su forma mimética, aunque en realidad sean repercusiones en vez de
 imitaciones.


Como tampoco basta, aunque el dicho es divertido y tiene algo de verdad, afirmar (oralmente) que 
para comprender la mentalidad primitiva no hacía falta ir a vivir con los salvajes, porque bastaba la 
experiencia de una sala de estar de un colegio de Oxford. Ernest Crawley, un director de escuela, 
afirmaba que el concepto de espíritu surge del alma que, en un estadio cultural posterior, pasa a ser 
el de dios; pero está en desacuerdo con él en cuanto a la génesis de la idea de alma. La religión es, 
por tanto, ilusión. En su obra “The Mystic Rose” sostiene que:



«Toda la constitución mental del hombre primitivo es religiosa o supersticiosa, y por ello la 
magia no debe separarse de la religión.»

En su teoría, la religión primitiva equivale prácticamente al tabú, producto del miedo; los espíritus en 
que creen los pueblos primitivos no son sino conceptualizaciones del peligro y del temor. Esta religión
 es esencialmente un producto más del miedo del hombre primitivo, de su desconfianza, falta de
 iniciativa, ignorancia e inexperiencia. A mayores peligros hay más religión, que por ello los estadios 
de cultura más primitivos son más religiosos que los posteriores, y las mujeres, más religiosas que los 
hombres, y también que Dios es producto de ciertos procesos psicobiológicos.


El antropólogo estadounidense Robert Henry Lowie fue el primero que intentó definir la noción de 
etnia al estudiar las diversas tribus amerindias de Estados Unidos de forma monográfica. La unidad 
de base de la etnología en el estudio exclusivo de determinadas etnias, ha sido habitual entre
 algunos antropólogos, que han creado así relaciones privilegiadas con los habitantes de una 
determinada región o territorio. Se puede afirmar que:


• Bronislaw Malinowski es el especialista de los pueblos de las islas Trobriand,
• Franz Boas el de los kwakiutl y
• Evans-Pritchard el de los nuer y azande.

La religión primitiva, según Lowie, se caracteriza por «...un sentido de lo Extraordinario, lo Misterioso 
y lo Sobrenatural» que la respuesta religiosa es «...de espanto y temor y su fuente es lo Sobrenatural, 
Extraordinario, Extraterrestre, Sagrado, Santo, Divino».


Para Malinowski, la magia difiere de la religión en que los ritos religiosos no tienen un objetivo 
ulterior, pues su finalidad se logra en los propios ritos, tales las ceremonias de nacimiento, pubertad 
y muerte. Psicológicamente son semejantes, porque la función de ambos es catártica.


Los hombres no saben lo bastante como para superar por medios empíricos las dificultades que les 
acosan, y por ello recurren a la magia, actividad viaria, dando escape a esa tensión entre la
 impotencia y el deseo que pone en peligro el éxito de sus empresas.


Carveth Read considera que la magia y el animismo son «creencias de la imaginación», por
 contraposición con las «creencias de la percepción», siendo éstas las del sentido común y la ciencia,
 que están sujetas a la percepción sensorial y derivan de ella.


Según Freud, el individuo pasa por tres fases libidinosas: narcisismo, dependencia respecto de los
 padres y madurez. Estas tres fases corresponden psicológicamente a las tres fases del desarrollo
 intelectual del hombre: la animista, la religiosa y la científica.


La magia es una satisfacción de deseos mediante la cual el hombre se ve gratificado gracias a la 
alucinación motriz y la religión es asimismo ilusoria.


(…)

La religión es, por tanto, una ilusión y Freud tituló su libro sobre el tema: “El porvenir de una ilusión”.

 

Adaptado por Antonio. Documento original y autoría:
 http://www.esnips.com/doc/acdd33cb-4be9-4657-8c39-f8b51ec454f6/Pritchard,-Evans---Teorias-de-La-Religion-Primitiva